A defendant can also benefit from the procedure by being better informed of the applicant`s rights and positions. Thus, toll agreements can help inform parties about disputes and avoid certain costs. The California Supreme Court has held that a fair toll can be done in carefully thought-out situations if necessary to avoid unwarranted technical forfeiture of the means, if the defendant is not prejudiced.  For example, if a college football player is injured or changes, he may have the option of applying for permission that could be granted an additional year. In reality, this suspension or toll allows it to participate longer than usual. All parties agree to its extension and will not challenge the authorization. It was decided that a fair toll would apply primarily where the applicant is actively misled by the defendant about the remedy, or is exceptionally prevented from asserting his rights. It is also important that the fair toll doctrine does not require fault on the part of the defendant, such as fraud or misrepresentation.  The threat of possible litigation is the elephant in space that makes an effective toll agreement. A savvy potential complainant may use this elephant as an advantage, as a potential accused may well lean back to not be prosecuted.
Before filing an appeal or starting an arbitration procedure, you should consider a simple legal instrument, called a toll agreement, that can help resolve disputes and avoid litigation altogether. Historically, the U.S. federal court has allowed „a fair toll in situations where the applicant has actively followed his appeals by making an erroneous plea during the legal period, or if the complainant was incited or deceived by his opponent`s misbehaviour to pass the filing period.“  The federal approach has been described as a merger of the fair toll principles and the Just Estoppel.  In the normal application of these principles, a fair toll does not require fault on the part of the defendant, while a just Estoppel requires reprehensible conduct on the part of the defendant such as fraud or misrepresentation.  Part of the printing when filing a complaint is certain that it will file before the applicable limitation period applies. A toll agreement is a written agreement signed by both parties for a possible appeal that suspends the statute of limitations for an agreed period. The Arizona courts have recognized and applied the fair toll doctrine.  For example, the state courts have allowed a fair toll: the toll of the current statute of limitations is not intended to do so and is not prescribed for any purpose other than that which [the defendant] has, have or would have had without that agreement.